<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org</link>
	<description>War on Terror intel for the infidels (America... F-yeah!)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ukrainian President: We Won&#8217;t Let Russia Add Us to Its Hit List &#124; Poland signs ABM Deal by Jetman</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/24/russia-satellites-abm-nato-ready/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/24/russia-satellites-abm-nato-ready/#comment-876</guid>
		<description>Wow! Great comment, Peer. 

I think it's important to support democracy, but the formal way to remove a leader who's misusing power in democracy is through impeachment. 

Impeachment with Georgia is something I'm researching as well. 

The other issue I'm researching is whether or not Georgian soldiers are to blame for 2000 deaths, along with what this 'irregular' army of South Ossetia may have done to citizens. On the surface it appears that the war may have been a great cover for selective weeding of South Ossetian dissent - this is a tactic that can provide a lot of fear.

To find out more about this, investigators need to ask WHO was killed, WHY they were killed, and WHAT social responsibilities and WHAT political viewpoints they were dealing with.

I also think that providing more oil and energy to the US is critical, but it doesn't remove the EU's dependence, which will continue well into this century. Poland's energy prices are right now being manipulated by Russia. 

Without subsidizing fledgling democracies - Iraq, Poland, and Georgia's reconstruction, these democracies will fail. There needs to be a recognition of the value of a liberal democracy; these countries never start wars with each other. What &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/24/AR2008082402150.html?sid=ST2008082500077&#038;s_pos=" rel="nofollow"&gt;happened in Georgia is still unclear&lt;/a&gt;, but it appears to be a poorly structured response to border skirmishing and over the border raiding. 

&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/24/AR2008082402150.html?sid=ST2008082500077&#038;s_pos=" rel="nofollow"&gt;WaPo article states&lt;/a&gt; the same stuff I'm thinking: "According to witnesses, the Ossetian militias began widespread looting. "They ask for access to the house, and if there's any protestations, they shoot them at the door," said Marcus Bleasdale, a freelance photographer who has traveled to villages in recent days, adding that he had seen several bodies in doorways."

...
" While Ossetian residents reported sporadic instances of looting by Georgian soldiers -- a DVD player here, an electric shaver there -- there were few reports of violence, and most deaths among Ossetians seem to have been caused by shelling.

&lt;strong&gt;"Nobody told us about any mistreatment, any cruelty by the Georgians as they entered the houses,"&lt;/strong&gt; said Anna Neistat, a senior emergencies researcher for Human Rights Watch, who spent several days interviewing witnesses in South Ossetia and Russia.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Great comment, Peer. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to support democracy, but the formal way to remove a leader who&#8217;s misusing power in democracy is through impeachment. </p>
<p>Impeachment with Georgia is something I&#8217;m researching as well. </p>
<p>The other issue I&#8217;m researching is whether or not Georgian soldiers are to blame for 2000 deaths, along with what this &#8216;irregular&#8217; army of South Ossetia may have done to citizens. On the surface it appears that the war may have been a great cover for selective weeding of South Ossetian dissent - this is a tactic that can provide a lot of fear.</p>
<p>To find out more about this, investigators need to ask WHO was killed, WHY they were killed, and WHAT social responsibilities and WHAT political viewpoints they were dealing with.</p>
<p>I also think that providing more oil and energy to the US is critical, but it doesn&#8217;t remove the EU&#8217;s dependence, which will continue well into this century. Poland&#8217;s energy prices are right now being manipulated by Russia. </p>
<p>Without subsidizing fledgling democracies - Iraq, Poland, and Georgia&#8217;s reconstruction, these democracies will fail. There needs to be a recognition of the value of a liberal democracy; these countries never start wars with each other. What <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/24/AR2008082402150.html?sid=ST2008082500077&#038;s_pos=" rel="nofollow">happened in Georgia is still unclear</a>, but it appears to be a poorly structured response to border skirmishing and over the border raiding. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/24/AR2008082402150.html?sid=ST2008082500077&#038;s_pos=" rel="nofollow">WaPo article states</a> the same stuff I&#8217;m thinking: &#8220;According to witnesses, the Ossetian militias began widespread looting. &#8220;They ask for access to the house, and if there&#8217;s any protestations, they shoot them at the door,&#8221; said Marcus Bleasdale, a freelance photographer who has traveled to villages in recent days, adding that he had seen several bodies in doorways.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
&#8221; While Ossetian residents reported sporadic instances of looting by Georgian soldiers &#8212; a DVD player here, an electric shaver there &#8212; there were few reports of violence, and most deaths among Ossetians seem to have been caused by shelling.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Nobody told us about any mistreatment, any cruelty by the Georgians as they entered the houses,&#8221;</strong> said Anna Neistat, a senior emergencies researcher for Human Rights Watch, who spent several days interviewing witnesses in South Ossetia and Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ukrainian President: We Won&#8217;t Let Russia Add Us to Its Hit List &#124; Poland signs ABM Deal by Peer Ception</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/24/russia-satellites-abm-nato-ready/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Peer Ception</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/24/russia-satellites-abm-nato-ready/#comment-875</guid>
		<description>The Ukrainian President is yet another 'unsophisticated' leader trying to get cash by 'crying wolf' or the 'Russians are coming'. It's amusing to see that Russia used its official, legitimate and UN sanctioned peacekeeping force within 8 hours of the attack on South Assetia to squelch the problem. From a military perspective a mobilization at that rate is impressive. On top Russia got away with a diplomatic win. One has to give this some respect and concern; results are results.
 These 'unsophisticated' leaders are looking for assistance from NATO who took 1 month to meet over South Assetia. At that rate it would take a decade to mount a counterattack. NATO is a discussion club for the lack of a better word. The 'North Atlantic' doesn't stretch to the Caspian Sea. US tax money (1 billion) is sent to Georgia to 'help'. I care more about our disabled vets; anyone thinking this investment is good should visit Georgia and reassess.
An ‘unsophisticated’ leader can sure start a war but can hardly can he be expected to finish one. Will NATO care to practically guarantee WWIII ? The US has plenty of brainpower and doesn’t need to flex its military muscle. These wars can be won at home not overseas.  Remove our energy dependence from countries who will never, ever like the US – that’s all it takes - even if it causes limited hardship in Houtson TX, it could be worth the effort. 
Trying to introduce ‘democracy’ to people who would never score better than a ‘D minus ‘in citizenship is as futile as the exercise to make them wealthy by buying their energy products.  Politics in Eastern Europe are influenced by the EU’s desire to control the ‘riches to the East’ since the EU is historically broke. Hadn’t it been for US efforts last century, there wouldn’t be an EU. More than 60% of all Ukrainians are against NATO membership and don’t like the EU. They are decent people and not scared of Russia who they have historical ties with. An inconvenient situation for the president of that country because it’s bad business for lining pockets, begging for cash and excusing problems with gas pipelines. Most people have no problems sending off ‘panhandlers’, why do politicians have such a difficulty with it?
There’s far spread disappointment that some of these countries to the East are neither stupid, poor nor defenseless.  Russia isn’t feeble and corrupt to the point it would give away their natural resources so international corporations can turn them into the ’Nigeria of Siberia’. NATO never will act without bankroll from the US but the US can never rely on NATO allies for military support. (Compare US  and coalition fatalities since WWII in any conflict) Continuing to deal with Russia without acknowledging that the soviet times are over and a new understanding must be found is likewise dumb and ignorant at the same time. Any Cold War rhetoric can safely be discarded as it has become obsolete and redundant.
Before getting in the position to pay for and then clean up messes created by people how have no business to start wars, wouldn’t it be more effective to remove the basis that enables these countries in the first place I.E. oil &#38; gas?  Making these resources obsolete will avoid WWIII, save US lives, bring peace and whatever the world is capable of experiencing in terms of democracy (a legacy system to some and overrate by many).
Fighting an enemy successful is strongly supported by weakening their supply line and their base of attack at the same time.  Take a look at the greater Middle East and draw a conclusion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ukrainian President is yet another &#8216;unsophisticated&#8217; leader trying to get cash by &#8216;crying wolf&#8217; or the &#8216;Russians are coming&#8217;. It&#8217;s amusing to see that Russia used its official, legitimate and UN sanctioned peacekeeping force within 8 hours of the attack on South Assetia to squelch the problem. From a military perspective a mobilization at that rate is impressive. On top Russia got away with a diplomatic win. One has to give this some respect and concern; results are results.<br />
 These &#8216;unsophisticated&#8217; leaders are looking for assistance from NATO who took 1 month to meet over South Assetia. At that rate it would take a decade to mount a counterattack. NATO is a discussion club for the lack of a better word. The &#8216;North Atlantic&#8217; doesn&#8217;t stretch to the Caspian Sea. US tax money (1 billion) is sent to Georgia to &#8216;help&#8217;. I care more about our disabled vets; anyone thinking this investment is good should visit Georgia and reassess.<br />
An ‘unsophisticated’ leader can sure start a war but can hardly can he be expected to finish one. Will NATO care to practically guarantee WWIII ? The US has plenty of brainpower and doesn’t need to flex its military muscle. These wars can be won at home not overseas.  Remove our energy dependence from countries who will never, ever like the US – that’s all it takes - even if it causes limited hardship in Houtson TX, it could be worth the effort.<br />
Trying to introduce ‘democracy’ to people who would never score better than a ‘D minus ‘in citizenship is as futile as the exercise to make them wealthy by buying their energy products.  Politics in Eastern Europe are influenced by the EU’s desire to control the ‘riches to the East’ since the EU is historically broke. Hadn’t it been for US efforts last century, there wouldn’t be an EU. More than 60% of all Ukrainians are against NATO membership and don’t like the EU. They are decent people and not scared of Russia who they have historical ties with. An inconvenient situation for the president of that country because it’s bad business for lining pockets, begging for cash and excusing problems with gas pipelines. Most people have no problems sending off ‘panhandlers’, why do politicians have such a difficulty with it?<br />
There’s far spread disappointment that some of these countries to the East are neither stupid, poor nor defenseless.  Russia isn’t feeble and corrupt to the point it would give away their natural resources so international corporations can turn them into the ’Nigeria of Siberia’. NATO never will act without bankroll from the US but the US can never rely on NATO allies for military support. (Compare US  and coalition fatalities since WWII in any conflict) Continuing to deal with Russia without acknowledging that the soviet times are over and a new understanding must be found is likewise dumb and ignorant at the same time. Any Cold War rhetoric can safely be discarded as it has become obsolete and redundant.<br />
Before getting in the position to pay for and then clean up messes created by people how have no business to start wars, wouldn’t it be more effective to remove the basis that enables these countries in the first place I.E. oil &amp; gas?  Making these resources obsolete will avoid WWIII, save US lives, bring peace and whatever the world is capable of experiencing in terms of democracy (a legacy system to some and overrate by many).<br />
Fighting an enemy successful is strongly supported by weakening their supply line and their base of attack at the same time.  Take a look at the greater Middle East and draw a conclusion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Olympic Spectators Shilling for China &#124; China&#8217;s Subsidized Caribbean Development Push by RatSass</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/16/chinas-shills-for-venezuelan-olympics-supports-caribbean-chinese-construction/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>RatSass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/?p=178#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Here are the top nine comments made by NBC sports commentators at
the 2008 Summer Olympics that they would like to take back:
 
1. Weightlifting commentator: "This is Gregoriava from Bulgaria. I
saw her snatch this morning during her warm up and it was amazing."
 
2. Dressage commentator: "This is really a lovely horse and I speak
from personal experience since I once mounted her mother."
 
3. Paul Hamm, Gymnast: "I owe a lot to my parents, especially my
mother and father."
 
4. Boxing Analyst: "Sure there have been injuries,and even some
deaths in boxing, but none of them really that serious."
 
5. Softball announcer: "If history repeats itself, I should think we
can expect the same thing again."
 
6. Basketball analyst: "He dribbles a lot and the opposition doesn't
like it. In fact you can see it all over their faces."
 
7. At the rowing medal ceremony: "Ah, isn't that nice, the wife of
the IOC president is hugging the cox of the British crew."
 
8. Soccer commentator: "Julian Dicks is everywhere. It's like
they've got eleven Dicks on the field."
 
9. Tennis commentator: "One of the reasons Andy is playing so well
is that, before the final round, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them... Oh my God, what have I just said?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the top nine comments made by NBC sports commentators at<br />
the 2008 Summer Olympics that they would like to take back:</p>
<p>1. Weightlifting commentator: &#8220;This is Gregoriava from Bulgaria. I<br />
saw her snatch this morning during her warm up and it was amazing.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. Dressage commentator: &#8220;This is really a lovely horse and I speak<br />
from personal experience since I once mounted her mother.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. Paul Hamm, Gymnast: &#8220;I owe a lot to my parents, especially my<br />
mother and father.&#8221;</p>
<p>4. Boxing Analyst: &#8220;Sure there have been injuries,and even some<br />
deaths in boxing, but none of them really that serious.&#8221;</p>
<p>5. Softball announcer: &#8220;If history repeats itself, I should think we<br />
can expect the same thing again.&#8221;</p>
<p>6. Basketball analyst: &#8220;He dribbles a lot and the opposition doesn&#8217;t<br />
like it. In fact you can see it all over their faces.&#8221;</p>
<p>7. At the rowing medal ceremony: &#8220;Ah, isn&#8217;t that nice, the wife of<br />
the IOC president is hugging the cox of the British crew.&#8221;</p>
<p>8. Soccer commentator: &#8220;Julian Dicks is everywhere. It&#8217;s like<br />
they&#8217;ve got eleven Dicks on the field.&#8221;</p>
<p>9. Tennis commentator: &#8220;One of the reasons Andy is playing so well<br />
is that, before the final round, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them&#8230; Oh my God, what have I just said?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So Others May Live &#124; My Personal Heroes by DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ooh-Rah &#124; What&#8217;s an Aircrewman?</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/05/26/so-others-may-live-my-personal-heroes/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ooh-Rah &#124; What&#8217;s an Aircrewman?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/?p=169#comment-873</guid>
		<description>[...] So Others May Live &#124; My Personal Heroes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Others May Live | My Personal Heroes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Forensic Proof: China&#8217;s Olympics Age Blunder by CharlesJeter.com &#187; Saturday&#8217;s Link Roundup</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/22/online-forensic-proof-china-cheated/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesJeter.com &#187; Saturday&#8217;s Link Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/22/online-forensic-proof-china-cheated/#comment-872</guid>
		<description>[...] seems that the Chinese Olympic gymnast age issue has some new online forensic evidence that points irrefutably to the Streisand effect taking place to rewrite history within the Chinese [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems that the Chinese Olympic gymnast age issue has some new online forensic evidence that points irrefutably to the Streisand effect taking place to rewrite history within the Chinese [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Olympic Spectators Shilling for China &#124; China&#8217;s Subsidized Caribbean Development Push by Barbados &#187; Olympic Spectators Shilling for China &#124; China’s Subsidized ...</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2008/08/16/chinas-shills-for-venezuelan-olympics-supports-caribbean-chinese-construction/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbados &#187; Olympic Spectators Shilling for China &#124; China’s Subsidized ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/?p=178#comment-871</guid>
		<description>[...] Olympic Spectators Shilling for China &#124; China’s Subsidized &#8230;One blog, the Barbados Free Press claims that a letter written by a contractor’s organization states local Carib companies have been outmanuvered by the Chinese construction for a contract for the University of The West Indies. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Olympic Spectators Shilling for China | China’s Subsidized &#8230;One blog, the Barbados Free Press claims that a letter written by a contractor’s organization states local Carib companies have been outmanuvered by the Chinese construction for a contract for the University of The West Indies. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party by Jetman</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Bring a lunch... 

...and friends! 

(I love a debate also) ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring a lunch&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;and friends! </p>
<p>(I love a debate also) <img src='http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party by r</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Debate...great, I love debate (here's to the net). I'm heading out now but will post later when I have time to be detailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debate&#8230;great, I love debate (here&#8217;s to the net). I&#8217;m heading out now but will post later when I have time to be detailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party by Jetman</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think it's a question of love towards the military. Most people I know who serve do it out of a sense of duty. They don't care if Bush 'loves' the military as long as they can do their job right. Personal opinions aside, once you start screwing with the mission, people stand a greater chance of dying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I remember watching the second plane hit the trade center on 9.11.01 and a few hours later, I heard the first eyewitness to what the NYFD and NYPD did out of a sense of duty. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The guy said something along the lines of, "... as we were running out, they were running in..."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's the shared sense of duty I see in the volunteer military of today. Do you realize that only 0.4% of this nation currently serves, and only 8.5% of this country's current living population ever served, in any capacity, peacetime or wartime?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the basis of a lie and WMD, well of course if you read this blog you'll find carefully researched analysis of these issues. Bottom line is that I don't know what your source is, but my sources include the BBC and CNN, not to mention official Government reports. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Al Qaeda link to Saddam - yes, there are confirmed reports. YadaYadaYada he supported terror and had access to mass casualty weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
www.saddamandterror.com has the most compelling evidence of this. Zawahiri was there for a reason, healing up from his battles within Afghanistan. There were training camps. Go get educated and come back to me debating the accuracy of those sources I researched. You say they're not legit, better back up your words or you look foolish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) WMD - well, I personally count RDDs as a Weapon of Mass Destruction. We recovered a few tons. TONS. Tons of highly radioactive material after the 2003 invasion.&lt;br /&gt;

Both those points are detailed in this previous post:
http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2004/10/18/my-letter-to-my-best-friends-regarding-wmd-and-iraq/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a question of love towards the military. Most people I know who serve do it out of a sense of duty. They don&#8217;t care if Bush &#8216;loves&#8217; the military as long as they can do their job right. Personal opinions aside, once you start screwing with the mission, people stand a greater chance of dying.</p>
<p>I remember watching the second plane hit the trade center on 9.11.01 and a few hours later, I heard the first eyewitness to what the NYFD and NYPD did out of a sense of duty. </p>
<p>The guy said something along the lines of, &#8220;&#8230; as we were running out, they were running in&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the shared sense of duty I see in the volunteer military of today. Do you realize that only 0.4% of this nation currently serves, and only 8.5% of this country&#8217;s current living population ever served, in any capacity, peacetime or wartime?</p>
<p>As for the basis of a lie and WMD, well of course if you read this blog you&#8217;ll find carefully researched analysis of these issues. Bottom line is that I don&#8217;t know what your source is, but my sources include the BBC and CNN, not to mention official Government reports. </p>
<p>1) Al Qaeda link to Saddam - yes, there are confirmed reports. YadaYadaYada he supported terror and had access to mass casualty weaponry.<br />
<a href="http://www.saddamandterror.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.saddamandterror.com</a> has the most compelling evidence of this. Zawahiri was there for a reason, healing up from his battles within Afghanistan. There were training camps. Go get educated and come back to me debating the accuracy of those sources I researched. You say they&#8217;re not legit, better back up your words or you look foolish.</p>
<p>2) WMD - well, I personally count RDDs as a Weapon of Mass Destruction. We recovered a few tons. TONS. Tons of highly radioactive material after the 2003 invasion.</p>
<p>Both those points are detailed in this previous post:<br />
<a href="http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2004/10/18/my-letter-to-my-best-friends-regarding-wmd-and-iraq/" rel="nofollow">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2004/10/18/my-letter-to-my-best-friends-regarding-wmd-and-iraq/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party by r</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>What was they're other argument? Ah, yes, something about WMD...well I guess they were wrong on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was they&#8217;re other argument? Ah, yes, something about WMD&#8230;well I guess they were wrong on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party by r</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/22/what-if-hillary-wins-military-attitude-towards-democratic-party/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Bush administration loves the military to death, sending them off, on the basis of a lie (pre-Iraq war - Iraq had no proven Al Quaeda link or 9/11 link - now it's hard to tell but it seems the suicided bombers or some thereof are "inspired" by Al Quaeda ideas) without sufficient armor to die in Iraq so that Haliburton et al can get richer quick. 

Hmm. Whole lotta love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Bush administration loves the military to death, sending them off, on the basis of a lie (pre-Iraq war - Iraq had no proven Al Quaeda link or 9/11 link - now it&#8217;s hard to tell but it seems the suicided bombers or some thereof are &#8220;inspired&#8221; by Al Quaeda ideas) without sufficient armor to die in Iraq so that Haliburton et al can get richer quick. </p>
<p>Hmm. Whole lotta love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Core Values by DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/core-values/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What If Hillary Wins? &#124; Military Attitude Towards Democratic Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/core-values/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] Core Values [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Core Values [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking the Bug Out Bag Ultralight by DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightweight Backpacking with Young Children</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2005/06/29/taking-the-bug-out-bag-ultralight/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkaDirka.RedGriffins.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightweight Backpacking with Young Children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2005/06/29/taking-the-bug-out-bag-ultralight/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] Clearly the same goes for prepping your lightweight version of your Earthquake Kit / Bugout Bag. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clearly the same goes for prepping your lightweight version of your Earthquake Kit / Bugout Bag. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NYPD Report on Homegrown Terrorism - New York Times by Mark Eichenlaub</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/15/nypd-report-on-homegrown-terrorism-new-york-times/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Eichenlaub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2007/08/15/nypd-report-on-homegrown-terrorism-new-york-times/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Dirka, thanks for the links and more importantly thanks for your service.  Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirka, thanks for the links and more importantly thanks for your service.  Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why a blog? by Jetman</title>
		<link>http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2004/10/18/why-a-blog/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirkadirka.redgriffins.org/2004/10/18/why-a-blog/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Then again, you'd have to also publish it in the other six languages our state puts onto the voting ballots. To be inclusive, of course!

I have a hard enough time trying to understand the issues on the ballots in plain English. Can you imagine the complexity of it in Tagalog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, you&#8217;d have to also publish it in the other six languages our state puts onto the voting ballots. To be inclusive, of course!</p>
<p>I have a hard enough time trying to understand the issues on the ballots in plain English. Can you imagine the complexity of it in Tagalog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
